Through the years there’ve been lots of a Science Fiction writer, myself included, speaking about the future challenges of machines that are smart, and smart robots – among the largest problems foreseen naturally, is that people can not match the rapid development of computer technology, it is becoming smarter each day, and in this speed people will soon be obsolete, replaced, meaning no demand for their labour or their choice making abilities. Let us talk this will we?

Clearly, if Alan Turning was speaking about this in the dawn of the personal computer era, it is not a recently considered dilemma, the one difference is that back then it was just being contemplated, and now these days, it’s here.

History of Computer Technology

What’s next? There have been many theories. I had a notion worthy of course. Folks can take their profits and purchase a robot, rent it out to some small business person for a determined amount each week, monthly, and utilize that as earnings. A lot of folks could co-buy robots, and let them businesses. Even worker unions could purchase industrial robots, and utilize such a strategy and plan to assist capitalize robots for the job – personnel gradually join the investment course.

“Microsoft founder Bill Gates creates fairly stunning argument-that robots that replace individual workers should incur taxation equal to that employee’s income taxation. At the moment, the individual employee who does, say, $50,000 worth of work at a mill, which income is taxed -When a robot comes into doing exactly the identical thing, you would believe we had taxed the robot in a similar degree. Gates asserts taxes, paid by means of a robot owners or manufacturers may be utilized to help fund labour force retraining. Former mill workers, motorists, & cashiers transition into healthcare, education, or other areas where individual employees will stay vital. Gates also indicates the policy would intentionally ‘slow down the rate of the adoption [of automation] marginally,’ committing more time to handle the wider transition”

This is where Bill Gates is wrong and right: First, this can be a possible strategy, particularly considering authorities rely on income taxation and fewer employees working way less income to the authorities to encourage the machine, society, or even nation. Secondly, it may work nicely for the short term. Now, here is why I feel this debate is faulty.

Gates mentioned ‘Health Services, schooling’ as possible areas where individuals are still desired. Incorrect, both of these sectors of our market are in bubble style, both prepared to explode. Health Care since ObamaCare is going to come to a monetary meltdown, and healthcare robots will soon be ubiquitous. Smart wheelchairs, homecare robots, and telerobotics in operation, and homecare helpers – nonetheless, IBM Watson and new entrants are replacing physicians for analysis, and we all know HMOs will need to reduce costs to live.

Gates’ debate, though intriguing and brought forth with the optimistic idea, is also a poor example as schooling is all about to go higher and virtual education is all about ready to input a fiscal crisis because of student loan debt, runaway heritage costs at universities and colleges, online education contest.

So whereas, Bill Gates has identified a true problem, not an unknown obstacle by anyway, and as he is placing his thinking cap to start the dialogue on potential answers, his first-off answers most likely won’t function as stated. In case you have thoughts about the best way best to handle this forthcoming dilemma please don’t hesitate to opine, comment or shoot me an email address.